Go for http://h-invitational.jp
M.
ocean wrote:
Hi Kieslowski,
for the 3'UTR, for my experience, i think the annotation from refseq is more
accurate, and so more reliable, but it might loose some 3'UTRs which are real
and annotated by Ensembl but missing in refseq. For Ensembl annotation, it's
true there are many more Transcripts with annotated 3'UTR comparing with refseq
anntation. which database to choose, it just depends.
best,
Huhaiyang
CAS-MPG Partner Institute for Computational Biology (PICB)
Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences (SIBS)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS)
320 Yueyang Road, Shanghai 200031, P.R.China
Tel:(86)-21-54920218
在2010-04-17，"Seema Trivedi"<[email protected]> 写道：
Hello kieslowski
Try biomart of Ensembl. choose the Homo sap. option and choose the Ensembl gene
(anyway the default), on features choose the UTRs and then click results. If
you have a limited number of gene list, you can paste it in the box just
beneath the gene/transcript etc. option. If you find it difficult there are
tutorial on the Ensembl website itself and possibly on the YouTubes as well.
All the best
Seema Trivedi
Associate Professor
Dept. of Zoology
JN Vyas University
Jodhpur (Raj)
342001
India
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:35:40 +0200
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: [BiO BB] How can I find reliable database of Human 3' UTRs ?
Dear BBB forum members
For my thesis, I was looking for reliable database of Human 3' UTRs.
Could someone please help me for that. I would really appreciate.
Thanks
_______________________________________________
BBB mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bbb
