Hi Sam,
(I should have mentioned this in the first place) I'm using
GNU Emacs 20.4.1 (sparc-sun-solaris2.7, X toolkit) of Sat Jul 31 1999
on shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu
running on
uname -a
SunOS dynasty.cs.columbia.edu 5.7 Generic_106541-10 sun4u sparc
(With display set to a PC running eXceed, which shouldn't matter.)
--
C-h f save-current-buffer RET
(under bbdb-2.00.06)
save-current-buffer is a built-in function.
Save the current buffer; execute BODY; restore the current buffer.
Executes BODY just like `progn'.
(save-current-buffer (set-buffer "*Messages*") (point))
returned: 2309
--
Under bbdb-2.2
before trying to do anything with BBDB save-current-buffer is define,
looks cool.
after (byte) compiling and loading bbdb.el, save-current-buffer is
still defined, looks the same as above.
(save-current-buffer (set-buffer "*Messages*") (point))
returned: 1797
after M-x rmail, updating to version 5
(save-current-buffer (set-buffer "*Messages*") (point))
returned: 1801
but if I try some bbdb thing, I have:
Signaling: (invalid-function #<subr save-current-buffer>)
save-current-buffer(#<buffer .bbdb> (("birthday") ("mail-alias") ("web")))
bbdb("huh" nil)
call-interactively(bbdb)
execute-extended-command(nil)
* call-interactively(execute-extended-command)
--
Er, I don't really know what is going on here.
dave
]
] > * In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
] > * On the subject of "Errors trying to upgrade to latest version of BBDB from
]2.00.06"
] > * Sent on Sun, 13 Aug 2000 22:47:10 -0400 (EDT)
] > * Honorable David Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
] >
] > I'm trying to upgrade to the latest version of BBDB (bbdb file
] > version 5) from 2.00.06, and I am having some trouble. I tried both
] > the tarball of 2.2, and also the latest release from the CVS.
]
] sorry about the bug.
]
] > It asks if I want to upgrade to v5, I say yes, and then I get this
] > stack trace:
] >
] > Signaling: (invalid-function #<subr save-current-buffer>)
]
] this is strange. what emacs are you using? is it an XEmacs?
]
] could you please investigate this further, namely...
]
] - visit bbdb.el; compile and load it;
]
] - do C-h f save-current-buffer RET
]
] - try (save-current-buffer (set-buffer "*Messages*") (point))
]
] thanks.
]
] --
] Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds)
] Micros**t is not the answer. Micros**t is a question, and the answer is Linux,
] (http://www.linux.org) the choice of the GNU (http://www.gnu.org) generation.
] There are two kinds of egotists: 1) Those who admit it 2) The rest of us
]
]
--
Dave Evans Sit on a potato pan, Otis! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~devans/ office:212-939-7120 ICQ#:25958171
_______________________________________________
bbdb-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/bbdb-info
