Nix wrote:
> On 13 Feb 2007, Len Trigg told this:
> > I had a bit of a hack and this is what I came up with (bits were
> > copied from the beginning of bbdb-annotate-message-sender). Basically
> > it sets bbdb-readonly-p to true if there's a field called readonly
> > associated with the record (if any). Please show me if there's a
> > better way to accomplish this (in particular how it interacts with
> > typical use of bbdb-readonly-p):
>
> I'd expect that you can use the bbdb-change-hook for that (although
> I haven't tried it).
By that time it's already too late, the annotations have already been
determined (and questions asked etc). Same applies to
bbdb-notice-hook.
Alternatives (that involve changing bbdb itself):
* Have a bbdb-annotate-message-sender-hook (but whether to have that
invoked with original arguments, or after any pre-existing record is
located)?
* Allow bbdb-readonly-p to be a function that takes a record as a
parameter, e.g.
(defun my-bbdb-readonly-p (record)
(or bbdb-readonly-p
(and record
(listp (bbdb-record-raw-notes record))
(cdr (assq 'readonly (bbdb-record-raw-notes record))))))
(setq bbdb-readonly-p 'my-bbdb-readonly-p)
Cheers,
Len.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
