Robert Widhopf-Fenk wrote: > Are you paranoid, or are there any bugs I missed ? ;-)
Mostly I just cut'n'pasted from elsewhere :-) > Your code should give you an error when a record has a > "readonly" field as you are returning a string which is > neither t nor a number. BTW (if "" t) will return t, > i.e. also the empty string is true! It does work fine (if sub-optimal). Any string seems to be considered true. E.g.: (if "1" t) also returns t. > (setq bbdb-quiet-about-name-mismatches > '(if (assq 'readonly (bbdb-record-raw-notes record)) t)) Much better, thanks. Cheers, Len. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
