On Tue Aug 14 2012 Leo wrote: > On 2012-08-14 05:34 +0800, Roland Winkler wrote: > > However, Leo's proposed change could also affect function names such > > as bbdb-record-note and bbdb-record-set-note that address individual > > note fields. To be internally consistent, these should become > > something like bbdb-record-ext and bbdb-record-set-ext. I am a bit > > hesitant to make such a change. > > Thanks Roland for the explanation. > > Come to think about it again, 'ext' is not a good name. I wonder if > there is one that doesn't look like note/notes/Notes? ;)
I thought about this for a little while because the name clash in the BBDB internals really annoyed me. In the end, the defstruct change from notes to Notes was the best that came to my mind. But as I said before: better suggestions welcome! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
