On 2012-08-21 11:46 +0800, Roland Winkler wrote: > I know where the prefix x comes from in this context. Still I do not > see how the code of BBDB becomes more clear if BBDB internals such > as bbdb-record-Notes are renamed to bbdb-record-x. There are good > reasons why Emacs commonly does not use names like foo-bar-x.
bbdb-record-x tells me it is about extensions. Additionally, fields contained in x become meaningful, such as bbdb-record-x-uid, bbdb-record-set-x-uid etc. That is clarify that can not be attained otherwise. Just some random thoughts. Leo ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
