> * Roland Winkler <jvax...@tah.bet> [2014-04-28 20:36:29 -0500]: > > The more I think about it the more I am convinced that there is no > reason bbdb-notice-mail-hook and bbdb-notice-record-hook should > treat bbdb-change-hook specially (by suppressing calls of > bbdb-change-hook).
does this imply that whenever I read a message from a known sender the sender's record's timestamp will be updated? -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on darwin Ns 10.3.1265 http://www.childpsy.net/ http://americancensorship.org http://memri.org http://ffii.org http://truepeace.org http://dhimmi.com A snake who stung your enemy is not necessarily your friend. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available. Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
