On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 05:08:42AM -0700, Walter Ian Kaye wrote: > At 03:26 p -0600 07/24/2011, LuKreme didst inscribe upon an electronic > papyrus: > > >On Jul 24, 2011, at 15:15, echo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> width + height attributes are not required on image tags. Perhaps > >> omitted to work with some responsive design techniques for images. > > > >Not REQUIRED, but strongly recommended. If someone coded a page > >without width+height I would make them fix it. > > When did it become optional? I thought it was required since, like, > 3.2 or something.
width and height attributes in img tags are not and have never been required. http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/objects.html#h-13.2 http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html32#img Ronald -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at <http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email "[email protected]" rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit>
