> can you please articulate why one might prefer using inline styling > for image height and width, rather than old school height and width > attritbutes?
Bruce, I had not even got that far as to which method (styling -vs.- attributes) I would use in the end. I was just aiming to get BBedit to type *either* method for me. I have not read enough articles on the topic to know which method will eventually be my preferred method. Meanwhile I tend to style images inline just out of convenience.. and so like Kerri says, why have extra attributes? But I am hardly prepared to make any argument about it. My OP was just to see if I could get my brand new BBedit10 install to perform as per the docs - auto-type width and height values, anywhere, somehow. While we are here, what is your argument (seemingly) for old-school attributes? Thanks, -Govinda -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at <http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email "[email protected]" rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit>
