I misunderstood your previous post -- your solution is better than I 
thought at first.  I will give it a go to see how it works in practice.  I 
agree that using an existing protocol & daemon is preferable (less work, if 
nothing else).  Usually I find that script-based solutions are fragile, and 
your comment to that effect made me suspicious.   :)


On Sunday, August 31, 2014 11:30:33 PM UTC-7, Charlie Garrison wrote:
>
> Good afternoon, 
>
> On 31/08/14 at 6:38 PM -0700, Andrew B 
> <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: 
>
> >Too ambitious? 
>
> Don't know, but not sure how that is much better than using SSH 
> as the daemon. All the communication can already be done with 
> SSH, so why introduce another protocol into the mix? 
>
> The IP address of the BBEdit machine should be easy enough to 
> get from the current login session, and then just set an 
> environment variable that the script uses. 
>
> Pretty much all the limitations with script I attached earlier, 
> can be solved with additional coding to harden the script. Even 
> the requirement for ExpanDrive could be replaced with `scp` commands. 
>
> The script does require 'remote login' to be enabled on the 
> BBEdit machine, but I don't see that as any more of a burden 
> than a separate daemon for this purpose. 
>
> Charlie 
>
> -- 
>     Charlie Garrison  <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
>     github.com/cngarrison   metacpan.org/author/CNG 
>
> O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org 
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt 
>
>

-- 
This is the BBEdit Talk public discussion group. If you have a 
feature request or would like to report a problem, please email
"[email protected]" rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit>

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BBEdit Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].

Reply via email to