On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 3:06 PM Charlie Garrison
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Good morning,
>
> On 7 Nov 2020, at 3:24, Steve deRosier wrote:
>
> I probably would've used rbbedit if it had existed when I started
> doing this, but the above works well for me and I've never had a
> reason to change my method.
>
> Yep, that's what rbbedit does (minus new file creation; I'll have to add 
> that), but just abstracts away many of the finer details so it's easy to 
> install and use on lots of servers.
>
> I'm curious, how long have you been using your scripts? rbbedit is still 
> young compared to BBEdit, but it's far from being an infant:

Honestly, I can't even remember.  I've been using BBEdit in some form
for > 20 years.  Best guess, I started using the .bashrc function and
bbeditcscope script > 10-12 years ago. For a long time I was making
very heavy use of sshfs/fuse or nfs mounting also, so that my files
just looked like "local" files. Lately not so much, relying much more
heavily on the sftp functions of BBEdit, especially as I'm relying
more and more on VPN access to central development servers.

Primary development use case: embedded Linux, so lots of work on Linux
drivers (C, DTS), build systems like OpenWRT and Buildroot (make and
CMake files), WiFi firmware, Python utilities and frameworks. I tend
to dislike IDEs as embedded doesn't lend itself well to that model.

- Steve

-- 
This is the BBEdit Talk public discussion group. If you have a feature request 
or need technical support, please email "[email protected]" rather than 
posting here. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <https://twitter.com/bbedit>
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BBEdit Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bbedit/CALLGbR%2BRfmys_PF7mODV-FjMT97ak6Eh9WvZSEJMTFEvU%3DRTvA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to