Excellent article in this month's SysAdmin magazine about this,
performance tuning oracle on solaris, nfs-mounted from a netapp.  I've
played with a test db done this way, performance was fine for single-
threaded queries.  I imagine anything heavier would get you into NFS 
tuning very quickly.

        The article mentions gig ethernet as one of the better fixes
for a slow db.  The things I'd be worried about, like db corruption from
dropped mounts, weren't mentioned as problems.  But, I've seen oracle 
restart fine after a system panic, this seems roughly analagous to all
tablespaces & logs going away when e.g. a nic or switch dies.

        Snap mirroring for backups, yup.  The other treat is "migrating"
a db by 'umount /u0*' and remounting 'em on another box.  Set up accounts,
script the mounts & startup, and you have an oracle instance moving from 
one box to another as fast as disk-based failover, without the limits of
disk hardware.


> i haven't done the math, but i can't imagine that any nfs version over
> any network medium can even begin to approach the performance of raw
> disk access over disparate HBAs.

        Exactly what I was thinking, before setting up some cp's for time.
Netapps are nutty fast, comparable to san rates.  Local disk isn't even
close, solaris nfsd neither.



Andrew Fant wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 16 May 2002, Chris Marget wrote:
> 
> > of course, you can't really use a netapp filer for a database and
> > expect any sort of reasonable performance.  but they make one hell of
> > a good fileserver.  i love 'em.  can you tell?
> 
> Actually,  Oracle has officially endorsed using Netapp Filers with Oracle
> 9i, and both of them seem to claim that this is a direction that they want
> to encourage the user base to go in, because to the way that the snap
> technology can simplify hot backups on large databases.  Who would have
> thunk it?
> 
> Andy
> 
> Andrew Fant      |   This    | "If I could walk THAT way...
> Molecular Geek   |   Space   |     I wouldn't need the talcum powder!"
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |    To     |          G. Marx (apropos of Aerosmith)
> Boston, MA USA   |   Let     |    http://www.pharmawulf.com
> 
> ---
> Send mail for the `bblisa' mailing list to `[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
> Mail administrative requests to `[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.


---
Send mail for the `bblisa' mailing list to `[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
Mail administrative requests to `[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.

Reply via email to