Dean Anderson expunged ([email protected]): > By contrast, IS-IS handles multiple protocols in one process with less > overhead. Configuaration & route distribution is always consistent. > There are no inter-op problems, and we know its going to work. Its a > no-brainer to use IS-IS instead of OSPF4 and OSPF6 together. So once > you see that no brainer, the next obvious no-brainer is to use CLNS > instead of IPV6. Once again, all the benefits of IPV6, none of the > drawbacks. There are no inter-op worries with CLNS.
Is this troll bait, or do you actually believe that? -Steve _______________________________________________ bblisa mailing list [email protected] http://www.bblisa.org/mailman/listinfo/bblisa
