On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 02:30 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > Ok, it's associated and pinging now, so I guess it works :) Basically, > all that needs to be done is the following:
Cool! > 1) Accept 0x900 as a chipcommon core - it has a revision of 1. Is this > likely to break any assumptions? Don't think so. > 2) Treat 0x820 as a PCI core, except: > 3) It only has a revision of 1, but needs to be treated like a PCI core > with a revision of 6 or above (is there a list of currently known core > versions?) Ok, that makes sense. > 4) The 80211 core is still 0x812, but has a revision of 0xa Yeah, well, that's ok. There are many revisions of that :) > 5) The MAC address is in et1macaddr, not il0macaddr. Should this be tied > to the the chipcommon core or the PCIE one? Is the SPROM still version 1? If so this one would indeed be strange. I'll look at the patch and update the specs accordingly. Thanks! johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
