On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 02:28:53PM +0200, Bin Zhang wrote: > On 9/7/06, Martin Langer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 04:51:08PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote: > >> Martin Langer wrote: > >> > Those old microcodes 2 and 4 seem to have a different instruction set > >in > >> > their firmware than later ones. So I'm afraid that those old bcm43xx > >> > cores are based on a different microprocessor. And if they are really > >> > based on a different microprocessor then their drivers will probably > >> > have different problems. But this theory will only fit if your problems > >> > are limited to the 0x812 rev2/rev4 world. Just my $0.02.
> I have this problem. This is the line in my syslog : > bcm43xx: Core 1: ID 0x812, rev 0x5, vendor 0x4243, disabled Ok, this will load bcm43xx_microcode5.fw which is one of the newer ones. So we can forget that idea. It can not related to those rare old ones only. Martin PS: Don't forget to send a copy of your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] next time. _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
