On 11/17/06, Larry Finger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Will Dyson wrote: > On 11/15/06, Larry Finger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> My records show a patch sent for testing on 9/22/06, but I have no record of when it went to >> wireless-2.6; however, on my system it is in wireless-2.6 (Linville) and 2.6.19-rc5 (Torvalds). >> Please check your sources using the command "grep bcm43xx_get_supported_dma_mask >> drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/*" to see if it has been applied to your source. If it has, I will be >> sending your some special diagnostic patches to help debug this problem. > > Larry, > > Sorry for being slow to follow up on this. It certainly looks as if > the patch has been applied. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/develop/kernel/linux-2.6$ grep > bcm43xx_get_supported_dma_mask drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/* > drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_dma.c: u64 mask = > bcm43xx_get_supported_dma_mask(bcm); > drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_dma.h:u64 > bcm43xx_get_supported_dma_mask(struct bcm43xx_private *bcm) > Please try the attached patch and send me the logged output from the initialization. Using the mem=1024M specification will be OK.
Applied and booted. The relevent info seems to be this: bcm43xx: dmabits = 0x0, mask = 0x30000 bcm43xx: nobits = 30, mask = 0x3fffffff My full dmesg output is attached. -- Will Dyson
dmesg
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
