Will Dyson wrote: > On 11/17/06, Larry Finger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Will Dyson wrote: >> > On 11/15/06, Larry Finger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> >> My records show a patch sent for testing on 9/22/06, but I have no >> record of when it went to >> >> wireless-2.6; however, on my system it is in wireless-2.6 >> (Linville) and 2.6.19-rc5 (Torvalds). >> >> Please check your sources using the command "grep >> bcm43xx_get_supported_dma_mask >> >> drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/*" to see if it has been applied to >> your source. If it has, I will be >> >> sending your some special diagnostic patches to help debug this >> problem. >> > >> > Larry, >> > >> > Sorry for being slow to follow up on this. It certainly looks as if >> > the patch has been applied. >> > >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/develop/kernel/linux-2.6$ grep >> > bcm43xx_get_supported_dma_mask drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/* >> > drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_dma.c: u64 mask = >> > bcm43xx_get_supported_dma_mask(bcm); >> > drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_dma.h:u64 >> > bcm43xx_get_supported_dma_mask(struct bcm43xx_private *bcm) >> > >> Please try the attached patch and send me the logged output from the >> initialization. Using the >> mem=1024M specification will be OK. > > Applied and booted. The relevent info seems to be this: > > bcm43xx: dmabits = 0x0, mask = 0x30000 > bcm43xx: nobits = 30, mask = 0x3fffffff > > My full dmesg output is attached.
This all looks normal. One thing just occurred to me - I'm not sure the code was tested with more than 2 GB RAM. Please try a boot with a 'mem=2048M' command on the boot line, and send me the new stuff from /var/log/messages (if it crashes), or dmesg if not. Thanks, Larry _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
