On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 12:17 +0100, Martin Langer wrote: > That's a good reason to develop an open firmware for those devices at > first. Without G support it's probably the easiest and smallest one, > too.
Quite the contrary. Those old devices use revision 3 and 4 cores where we haven't even deciphered the instruction set yet. Besides, the firmware is only a MAC processor, whether things are A, B or G doesn't really make a difference. johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
