On 1/28/07, Igor Korot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >-snip- > > + core_rev = (sb_id_hi & 0x7000) >> 8; > + core_rev |= (sb_id_hi & 0xF); > > -snip- > > + core_rev = ((sb_id_hi & 0xF) | ((sb_id_hi & 0x7000) >> 8)); > > Notice the difference in the calculation of the core_rev variable. > > Which version is correct one?
Those appear to be functionally equivalent to me. _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
