Igor Korot wrote: > Hi, Larry, > > In the patch ftp://lwfinger.dynalias.org/patches/patch_2.6.18.1_for_PCI-E, > there is a following code:
> + core_rev = (sb_id_hi & 0x7000) >> 8; > + core_rev |= (sb_id_hi & 0xF); > + core_rev = ((sb_id_hi & 0xF) | ((sb_id_hi & 0x7000) >> 8)); > Notice the difference in the calculation of the core_rev variable. > > Which version is correct one? To my eye they result in the same thing, and the only difference is one line or two and some additional parentheses. Am I missing something? Larry _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
