Michael Buesch wrote: > On Thursday 02 August 2007, Larry Finger wrote: >> Michael, >> >> I couldn't find any long/short indication in the header, so I added a bool >> that >> is set when the frame is sent. > > This is not going to work. > > But we can do this differently. > You can do something like: > > if (!status->acked && !tx_control->noack) > excessive_retries = 1; > > So we don't need to care about the retry count. > > Anyway. I don't know why we need excessive_retries _at_ _all_. > The rc algorithm does already know if the frame succeed or failed > anyway.
Yes, it does, but it only looks at the potential for reduction if excessive retries is set. Why? Because it was coded that way! As I said earlier, I don't want to get involved there. I'll try to implement it as above. Larry _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
