On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:36:44 +0100
Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Stefano Brivio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:00:11 +0100
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Well, are you 100% sure that everyone interested knows that this
> >> drivers is going out in 2.6.25 and no one will object?
> >
> > The maintainers know. Having both drivers in 2.6.24 should help find
> > out if there's anything which should be ironed out with b43/b43legacy,
> > but right now they are already working a lot better than bcm43xx, and
> > they are more stable. So I couldn't find a reason why we shouldn't
> > remove bcm43xx in 2.6.25.
> 
> b43 still does not work at all on ppc.

This is strange. Because it has been developed mainly on PPC. Plus, if you
could better define "does not work" as per
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html, it would be great.


-- 
Ciao
Stefano
_______________________________________________
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev

Reply via email to