On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:19:55 +0100 Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefano Brivio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > This is strange. Because it has been developed mainly on PPC. Plus, if > > you could better define "does not work" > > See <http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=119356497407301&w=2>. It looks like we don't get a valid txstatus even if the txstatus indicator register told us we could read it. The only difference I can see between bcm43xx and b43 here is that in bcm43xx we allowed the whole register to be non-zero, while in b43 we check a bit only (as per v4 specs). Would you mind to try this: --- drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c.orig 2007-11-20 01:12:12.186524483 +0100 +++ drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c 2007-11-20 01:12:34.922702865 +0100 @@ -947,7 +947,7 @@ while (1) { v0 = b43_read32(dev, B43_MMIO_XMITSTAT_0); - if (!(v0 & 0x00000001)) + if (!v0) break; v1 = b43_read32(dev, B43_MMIO_XMITSTAT_1); (probably it's not the solution, I just want to see what happens then). BTW, what firmware are you using? Michael, any clue? -- Ciao Stefano _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
