Mark Hagger wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 04:26 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> This is not about helicopters, but I just want you to know that I'm >> selling my TigerHawke Raptor 60, and it works out of the box (RTF). So >> I'm not interested in Bell 222 mockups that look like Airwolf Anymore ... > > I don't believe you, next you'll be saying that a helicopter that can do > Mach 2 isn't theoretically possible. > > Mark > > The differing speed between the leading edge and a trailing edge of a rotating aerofoil where not only is the difference in excess of the speed of Sound (sonic boom) but the Cyclick may encounter a sonic boom on the control surfaces during normal maneoeuvers depending on V-x where V is the absolete speed in a vector and x is the speed back or sideways such that the speed of Sound is crossed.
A rotatry wing was not constructed for that. So to answer your comment, if you can get a rotary winng to Mach 1 you can get it to Mach 2. In fact if you have a SUFFICCIENTLY SLOW rotary wing, you SCRAMjet it to MACH2+, and then the trailing edge will still be higher than mach 1 so you'll be ok. Back to b43 it is. Ehud > ________________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned for all known viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan > service. > _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
