On Wednesday 29 April 2009 18:01:32 Bo Han wrote:
> I see.  But I think it may not be reasonable to always use 1 Mbps as
> the fallback rate, which will reduce the throughput... 

Yeah. It's the job of the rate control to select a reasonable rate for fallback.

> Also, when MRR 
> is not supported, we should not get the fallback rate from rate
> control algorithms (like minstrel) in the current way, right?

Why not? It's called rate-control, because it controls rates. Including 
fallback.
One fallback is not different from multi-fallback. It's just only one rate 
instead of n rates.
It's still the job of the RC to find out which one is best. The driver 
certainly can't do this.

-- 
Greetings, Michael.
_______________________________________________
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev

Reply via email to