On Do, 2009-10-22 at 17:06 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: > + static int count; count is declared, and incremented, but never set to 0. I guess this will work anyway, because it might be magically cleared to 0 by defining it (it is static, and will probably be allocated to some place that is zeroed before), but I'd find it much cleaner if this was declared like static int count = 0;
> > slot = (int)(&(desc->dma64) - descbase); > B43_WARN_ON(!(slot >= 0 && slot < ring->nr_slots)); > @@ -190,6 +191,10 @@ static void op64_fill_descriptor(struct > desc->dma64.control1 = cpu_to_le32(ctl1); > desc->dma64.address_low = cpu_to_le32(addrlo); > desc->dma64.address_high = cpu_to_le32(addrhi); > + if (count++ < 10) > + b43dbg(ring->dev->wl, "cntrl0, cntrl1, addrlo, addrhi: 0x%X > 0x%X" > + " 0x%X 0x%X\n", desc->dma64.control0, > desc->dma64.control1, > + desc->dma64.address_low, desc->dma64.address_high); > } _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
