On Monday 28 December 2009 05:49:14 Larry Finger wrote: >+ tmp &= ~(SSB_IMCFGLO_SERTO | SSB_IMCFGLO_REQTO_SHIFT);
This does not make any sense. Did you mean: + tmp &= ~(SSB_IMCFGLO_SERTO | SSB_IMCFGLO_REQTO); >+ tmp |= 3; So you set SER-timeout to 3 and REQ-timeout to 0. Is that what we want? REQ=zero smells fishy to me, but if the broadcom code also does this, I'm OK with it. -- Greetings, Michael. _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
