On 12/28/2009 12:33 PM, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Monday 28 December 2009 05:49:14 Larry Finger wrote: >> + tmp &= ~(SSB_IMCFGLO_SERTO | SSB_IMCFGLO_REQTO_SHIFT); > > This does not make any sense. > Did you mean: > + tmp &= ~(SSB_IMCFGLO_SERTO | SSB_IMCFGLO_REQTO); > > >> + tmp |= 3; > > So you set SER-timeout to 3 and REQ-timeout to 0. Is that what we want? > REQ=zero smells fishy to me, but if the broadcom code also does this, I'm OK > with it.
I did get that wrong. The Broadcom code does the equivalent of tmp = tmp & ~0x77 | 3 which is what my code ended up doing by accident, but REQ is set to zero. Are these values discussed anywhere in the open? I have not found anything regarding the SSB configuration. Larry _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
