On Tuesday 12 January 2010 20:38:07 Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> struct nphy_txgains { u16 txgm[2]; u16 pga[2]; u16 pad[2]; u16 ipa[2]; };
> +struct nphy_iq_est { s32 iq0_prod; u32 i0_pwr; u32 q0_pwr; s32 iq1_prod;
> + u32 i1_pwr; u32 q1_pwr; };
So it seems I didn't notice this earlier, but this violates kernel coding style.
Please do a separate patch that converts all structs from
struct foo { a; b; c; };
to
struct foo {
a;
b;
c;
};
> + if (wait)
> + b43_phy_set(dev, B43_NPHY_IQEST_CMD, B43_NPHY_IQEST_CMD_MODE);
> + else
> + b43_phy_mask(dev, B43_NPHY_IQEST_CMD, B43_NPHY_IQEST_CMD_MODE);
Looks wrong to me.
Do you want this?
+ if (wait)
+ b43_phy_set(dev, B43_NPHY_IQEST_CMD, B43_NPHY_IQEST_CMD_MODE);
+ else
+ b43_phy_mask(dev, B43_NPHY_IQEST_CMD, ~B43_NPHY_IQEST_CMD_MODE);
> +/* http://bcm-v4.sipsolutions.net/802.11/PHY/N/TxIqWar */
> +static void b43_nphy_tx_iq_workaround(struct b43_wldev *dev)
> +{
> + u16 array[4];
> + int i;
> +
> + b43_phy_write(dev, B43_NPHY_TABLE_ADDR, 0x3C50);
> + for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
> + array[i] = b43_phy_read(dev, B43_NPHY_TABLE_DATALO);
> +
> + b43_shm_write16(dev, B43_SHM_SHARED, 0x0700, array[0]);
> + b43_shm_write16(dev, B43_SHM_SHARED, 0x0702, array[1]);
> + b43_shm_write16(dev, B43_SHM_SHARED, 0x0704, array[2]);
> + b43_shm_write16(dev, B43_SHM_SHARED, 0x0706, array[3]);
Do we have some names for the SHM locations?
If not, just do some defines.
#define B43_SHM_SH_NPHY_TXIQW0 0x0700
#define B43_SHM_SH_NPHY_TXIQW1 0x0702
...
in b43.h (next to the other SHM_SH defines)
--
Greetings, Michael.
_______________________________________________
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
