W dniu 12 stycznia 2010 23:51 użytkownik Rafał Miłecki <[email protected]> napisał: > 2010/1/12 Michael Buesch <[email protected]>: >> On Tuesday 12 January 2010 20:38:07 Rafał Miłecki wrote: >>> struct nphy_txgains { u16 txgm[2]; u16 pga[2]; u16 pad[2]; u16 ipa[2]; }; >>> +struct nphy_iq_est { s32 iq0_prod; u32 i0_pwr; u32 q0_pwr; s32 iq1_prod; >>> + u32 i1_pwr; u32 q1_pwr; }; >> >> So it seems I didn't notice this earlier, but this violates kernel coding >> style. >> Please do a separate patch that converts all structs from >> struct foo { a; b; c; }; >> to >> struct foo { >> a; >> b; >> c; >> }; > > OK, will do.
I'll use separated patch to correct old wrong-styled definitions. No reason to use wrong style when adding new struct with this patch. -- Rafał _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
