Hey Everyone! The BGP Operations and Security draft just became rfc7454. This BCP is great and seems to have pretty spectacular overlap with this NANOG BCOP.
Barry mentioned alignment with the draft but I'd be interested to understand what the community thinks the direction of this BCOP ought to be in light of this RFC publication. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7454 http://bcop.nanog.org/index.php/EBGP_Configuration_BCOP_v0.1 Bill On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 10:30 PM, BARRY GREENE <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Feb 10, 2015, at 5:24 AM, Scott Morris <[email protected]> wrote: > > I can incorporate them into the draft stuff I worked on. > > > Not for this draft, but for the next one, I’ll put together a reference > section from all the older “BGP BCP” materials. This will go back to the > ISP Workshop materials and work forward. I’ll include all the NANOG > tutorial/session pointers. > > One other point, what about > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-bgp-security-07??? > > I think we should try some sort of alignment. If our goal is “behavior > change,” then we should ensure the two documents provide the same guidance. > Duplication is A-OK. We just reference each other. > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ BCOP mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/bcop
