Miah M. Hussainuzzaman wrote:
> I am just an end user. Not anyone relating IT profession (Civil
> Engineer).
>
> Recently, to solve this problem in my personal level (very very old
> laptop, 64MB RAM Celeron processor, only runs windows 98, but
> doesn't get USB port) I have gone through some searches and reading.
>
> 1. The community is working on Fluxubuntu, which is scheduled as the
> ubuntu release + 3 months. They have an website (google:
> fluxubuntu). The default is fluxbox here.
>
> 2. Another small community is working on releasing UbuntuLite. This
> includes IceWM as the default window manager - and from other
> sources I have learned that IceWM is the most miser for memory
> requirements; besides it have themes look alike Windows 95 and XP.
> There was a previous release called UbuntuLite 1.1 based on 6.04 I
> guess. Now the new version based on 7.04 is scheduled to be released
> on 19th July (If I can remember correctly). This community have no
> website, but all the communications are limited within google
> groupmail. The latest version (7.04 based) have passed alpha testing
> phase, and now in beta testing phase.
>
> My question/request is:
> why choosing xfce for default, but not lighter IceWM? Because, xfce
> system i.e. xubuntu recommends at least 128 MB of RAM for proper
> running (though it says 64MB is OK but not recommended). On the
> otherhand IceWM is fine with 64MB RAM.
>
হ্যা তাও ঠিকআছে মূল উদ্দ্যেশ্য হল লো কনফ' পিসিতে চালানো । এক্ষেত্রে যত লাইটার
ডেক্সটপ হয় ততোই ভালো। আর মূল শ্রাবণি সিডিতে যায়গা হলেএক্ই সাথে দুটো ডেকসটপ
রাখা যেতে পারে গনোম (উবুন্টুর মূল ডেক্সটপ এনভা') আর লাইটেস্ট ডেক্সটপ
এনভায়রনমেন্ট
> Please consider facility and lightweightness while choosing between
> xfce, fluxbox, iceWM or any other lighter system, which I dont know.
>
> Pardon me for any inconvenience.
>
> Regards,
> Shamim.
>
>
>
>
>
