Omi Azad wrote: > On 9/17/07, Sajed Chowdhury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Why not BDOSN? Wouldn't that be more effective and more likely to get >> published? >> >> hai man!! who care about rumor .. do you hav any solid proof ??? >> Please don't take it otherwise, but a rumor is going on that BDOSN is up to >> making money and they are up to sucking money from orgs like IOSN etc. :( >> >> Omi >> >> >> >>
- Re: [bdlug] Re: ISO says no to OOXML - at least for now Omi Azad
- Re: [bdlug] Re: ISO says no to OOXML - at least for now Darklord (:=
- [bdlug] Re: ISO says no to OOXML - at least for now cse_890
- Re: [bdlug] Re: ISO says no to OOXML - at least for now Zico
- Re: [bdlug] Re: ISO says no to OOXML - at least for now Jamil Ahmed
- Re: [bdlug] Re: ISO says no to OOXML - at least for now Aronno
- Re: [bdlug] Re: ISO says no to OOXML - at least for now Jamil Ahmed
- Re: [bdlug] Re: ISO says no to OOXML - at least for now Sajed Chowdhury
- Re: [bdlug] Re: ISO says no to OOXML - at least for now Zico
- [bdlug] Re: [OT] Re: ISO says no to OOXML - at least for n... Omi Azad
- Re: [bdlug] Re: ISO says no to OOXML - at least for now Darklord (:=
- Re: [bdlug] Re: ISO says no to OOXML - at least for now Omi Azad
