On 9/17/07, Sajed Chowdhury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why not BDOSN? Wouldn't that be more effective and more likely to get > published?
Please don't take it otherwise, but a rumor is going on that BDOSN is up to making money and they are up to sucking money from orgs like IOSN etc. :( Omi [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
