On 10/15/07, raihan hasnain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > becoming vista isn't an option > those who really use vista, will never switch to anything else. >
Why? Vista don`t has capability to race with any linux. Moreover, it don`t has capability to run with XP even. How about copy in Vista? It takes too too much time to copy a normal file from one folder to another. I am talking about Core 2 duo with 2 Gb ram. How about permission? When you are going to restart or shutdown your vista; it don`t *confirm* from user. Anyone can *shut down* his computer by mistake to do *log off*; XP even prevent such type of mistake with persmission; but Vista don`t ask anything... just shut it own. And even, XP users don`t want to use Vista; cause it looses it`s *user-friendly* ness from various point. I saw one XP user using Vista. It took him long time to find out the *power off* button from start menu. :) So.... Best, Zico On 10/15/07, Omi Azad <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <omi%40ekushey.org>> wrote: > > > > Because in Linux we have all options open. You might not like it, but > > many users may switch to Linux only for this. > > > > -- > > Omi > > http://omi.net.bd > > > > Bangla Computing Projects: http://ekushey.org > > OSS News in Bangla: http://mukto.org > > > > Zico wrote: > > > On 10/15/07, Omi Azad <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > <omi%40ekushey.org><omi%40ekushey.org>> wrote: > > > > > >> Home page: http://vixta.sf.net/ > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Why do linux need that? Do Linux really cares about this? We have much > > much > > > much nice graphical magic than windows in Linux with the touch of > Beryl. > > > Isn`t it? :) > > > > > > Best, > > > Zico > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > -- "free software is a movement, a way of life.... http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/ " http://mohibuzzaman.blogspot.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
