Hi! Allan, For the benefit and casual readers, I think distinction should be made between Orgone Accumulators and Dor Busters.
Orgone Accumulators, normally having concentric, alternating layers of material such as sheep's wool and steel wool, with a central void, into which Orgone is accumulated and seeds or even a person is placed for beneficial treatment. Seeds planted after a few days in an accumulator, jump away and have a high germination rate etc. With the person sized model, there are reports of difficult conditions cured or relived. Orgone is live supporting and occurs naturally, such as near waterfalls etc. Dor Busters are used to break up "Dory atmosphere" that prevent precipitation (both rain and heavy dew). Some Dor conditions are probably natural, but many are related to man and his activities, such as atmospheric pollution, heat inversion etc. The Dor Buster usually has a tube in some form and running water. See the DeMeo material. The hazard is that the Dor is collected and gathers in the water and around the instrument and is anything but life supporting. Large scale weather modifying size ones should only be used with great caution. I have designed a remote controlled intended to break up Dor conditions involved in catastrophic wild fire conditions, when often clouds containing large amounts of water are present, but because of Dor, can not precipitate. My devise would be positioned up weather from the fire event and operated remotely in a controlled secluded place and left in place for later decontamination and recovery. Hugh Lovel observed that in an ideal environment (large BD system) Dor does not build up. Therefore the projection (broadcast) of a large area of BD energies would clear the Dor or the Dor producing conditions. He has successfully done this using his Field Broadcaster and the BD energy in a carefully ran sequence. [I think he has published this, but not sure, so will not detail it.] My feeling is that the RS BD Preps are exactly what is required in the area where they were developed. The further from that area and those conditions we are, the less they are suited. Oz is so much different from even NZ. I feel that we in Oz require parallel energies to the original RS BDs, that are specific for our conditions. I have been working on this for eighteen months and have included provision for directly, specifically removing the obstacles to precipitation. Thus instead of using the BD energies intended for other purposes, I have jumped to particular end result I am looking for and developed what would look to be a working system for that. I was about to have a go at a remote weather station in a very low rainfall area, but a stray weather system is possibly going near it, so have held my hand. Before I am asked, I will not be posting enough detail for others to experiment on this. I believe that the use of energy on this scale requires extensive training and careful selection of people to be trained. I am in the loop for formal Radionic Training and have been in England at Keys College of Radionics to extend my knowledge. I will be teaching their course in Australia and at some point, my developments will be available to our graduate students. Very sorry, there will be no stand alone weekend workshops on how to change the weather. Our graduates will also be given insight into the design and development of Radionic Devices, as there is much about these that are not as it looks, if you take the cover off and try to copy them. Gil Robertson Radionic Centre of Australia Seventh Dragon Energetics Gil Robertson Consulting P.O. Box 51 Port Lincoln SA Australia 5606 61 8 86824779 61 0427 312 401 Allan Balliett wrote: > >Hi! Allan, > >My mistake, that email was meant to be off list. The person I was replying to > >had been involved in a drought breaking discussion, using a form a Radionic > >Broadcast, not a DeMeo device, which I consider too dangerous for use except > >by remote control. The Radionic device was designed and built in Australia > >and the builder intended it for other than drought breaking and he does not > >know of the work. Based on some of hugh's work, I decided to develop that > >which is necessary for our particular conditions in Oz. I did this > >successfully in the spring of 2000. My post related to further discussion on > >this track and I did not intend to post it to the list. Sorry. > > Gil - Recognizing the problems in the atmosphere and proposing > solutions for those problems are certainly topics that are > appropriate for this discussion list. > > Why remote control for a shooter? Because it can be 'channeling' very > toxic energy? > > My plans for a home accumulator were set aside after reading DeMeo's > warnings. As is better known nowadays, an lifeforce accumulator can > accumulate DOR with great effeciency. Nothing like climbing into a > cabinet with concentrated FM waves, eh? > > -Allan
