>> >>Re Geoff's questions; >>I could go on all night on that one ! >> >>Best, >> >>Mark.
Please do....that's what most of us on this list are here for, taking the twenty-odd messages a day for, hoping for the nuggets that appeal to each of us in our separate searches. Your open and quick response to problems, contradictions, faulty model appliations etc. gives me hope that your are what you seem to date. Thanks. Any one who admits an example like Guernsey sticks in their craw shows what I like to see...an open mind that doesn't immediately discount the inconvienient. So very nice to see. As someone who make his basic living (apart from viticulture) as a freelance journalist, I'd love to see the various games exposed so people would take the time to figure out who or how to talk to media...the vast majority are hacks (for various personal reasons). Dealing with journalists should be basically as time intensive as in developing any new friendship...anyone who is in a rush, give them only cursory, basic points and time...they'll get it wrong anyways, or, as Marks says, are working consciously or unconsiously for the ' other ' side. Mark...what are your immediate goals regarding scientific or 'popularization' or democratization of you work to date and in future? Where do yo feel vulnerable on what you've done to date? Cheers, Geoff Heinricks Prince Edward Co., Ontario
