Dear Hugh, Both Lloyd and I have found that the mixtures of reagents can change from day to day, let alone from year to year. As for dowsing it is an easily learnt skill as the participants at our dowsing workshops at "Sattwa Park" can testify to. How any body can use a field broadcaster without dowsing skills is beyond my comprehension Sincere regards James. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hugh Lovel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 1:01 PM Subject: Re: Agri-Synthesis® short-lived and overpriced? was Re: Agri-Synthesis® Remedies Tested At UAI
> Dear Glen, et. al., > > Your post confirms what Lorraine has found. "Mixes are often specific for > the situation, time and weather circumstance." > > That's why we tailor our broadcaster reagents to each and every farm. And > change them at a minimum of every year. So what we have found is the > expertise rather than copying of remedies is the important thing. One has > to be able to tell (Lorraine does this by dowsing) what potency of each > remedy she puts on the reagent vials for our broadcasters. Commonly one > farm is quite different from another. > > Best, > Hugh > > > > > >Hugh, Alan, Gil and Chris > >Thank you for your thoughts and suggestions. I see the value in Hugh and > >Alans approaches and will work with them and see what I can do with > >them. > >Gils comments on 'unknowing messing around' are true to a point however > >dowsing and a radionics box could do some wild things. The uniqueness I > >see is in the original mixing for a specific task. > >This was a question that needed to be asked publically for the community > >to consider. > >While I have made general mixes of things, with our 'personal clients' > >the mixes are most often specific for the situation, time and weather > >circumstance. These would be silly to generally copy. > >I am sure there is a way forward, just in a different direction to that > >already travelled and that imagined to be travelled. Sounds like another > >bit of 'life' taking place. > >cheers > >Glen > > > > > >Chris Shade wrote: > >> > >> Glen has a good point, and frankly, I was surprised > >> that Allan so openly suggested that. > >> > >> On the flip side, though, most people (who dont' > >> already make some of their own preps), won't be in a > >> position to make good copies of Glen and Greg's > >> potencies. And if radionic theft is the issue, it > >> would have always been the issue with any prep. You > >> just have to figure that your market is those who > >> aren't radionics or homeophath jockeys and who need > >> some good preps. > >> > >> Wishing you market protection and good will from your > >> community, > >> Chris > >> > >> --- Glen Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Allan Balliett wrote: > >> > > > >> > > >> > > A question I have for everyone is "Can't Greg's > >> > remedies be readily > >> > > propagated infinitely?" Since they are potentized, > >> > are they not now > >> > > the 'mother' for endless batches of equal remedy? > >> > I would think they > >> > > are, but I'd appreciate insights from you more > >> > experienced > >> > > potentizers. Myself, I assume that once you buy a > >> > unit from Greg, if > >> > > you don't spill it, you need never purchase > >> > another, but simply dose > >> > > your own units from that point on. > >> > > >> > This does not necessarily hold to be true. Firstly > >> > these are compounds > >> > which when further potentised can change their > >> > effectiveness and > >> > secondly potentising develops in waves and so > >> > further potentising can > >> > indeed make them less effective. We have definitely > >> > found that reducing > >> > the desired application rate leads to reduced > >> > effect. 'Stealing them' > >> > thru a radionics device, without changing the > >> > potency should work within > >> > that sphere I guess. > >> > > >> > This is an opportune moment to bring a thought to > >> > this discussion. With > >> > Greg and my potencies ( and thus our lives work) > >> > being 'potentially' so > >> > easily stolen from us, what incentive is there for > >> > us to continue > >> > working on furthering preparation applications. Why > >> > would we bother? and > >> > how are our overheads and life expenses to be > >> > covered by the community > >> > benefiting so freely from our work? > >> > in anticipation of the solution > >> > Glen > >> > > >> > >> __________________________________________________ > >> Do You Yahoo!? > >> Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games > >> http://sports.yahoo.com > > > >-- > >Garuda Biodynamics - for BD Preps, Consultations, Books & Diagrams > >See our web site @ http://get.to/garuda > >
