Dears, I think you'll find the BC, 500 and Pfeiffer sprays have quite different properties. I think if we test these every way we can think of we will know a lot more about the whole picture. We should also test prepotentized 500 and Courtney's version of Podolinsky's prepared 500 and so forth.
I'll be meeting in early May with Elaine Ingham, Scott Crandall, Paul Feiber, etc. out in Oregon on a vineyard research project. It might help this project if we have one of Elaine's biological assay of each of the BD remedies from the horn manure all the way up to fresh brewed and also fermented horsetail decoction. I haven't sent in samples as I don't knopw what Elaine might think of analysing so many samples without some money up front. If we can get the funding for this I can come up with the samples. Heck I make these things. And unlike, as Greg implied a bit ago when he was bragging beyond reason that his preps went six times around Lorraine's determination board and why didn't I, Hugh Lovel, have Lorraine test my preps? As though mine must be inferior? Sheesh! Lorraine lives here at UAI. How could she not have tested my preps? It was revealing to have Greg slap me like that and then to get so pissed at me for responding in the ludicrous extreme that, of course, my preps were way better than his. Well, he couldn't take a joke and has threatened to sue me. The pity is he is serious. So much for Greg's sense of humor. I think what pissed him most is I told him to grow up. I guess he must not know one only treats FRIENDS that kind of boisterous rough. How can I be his friend when he is threatening to take me to court? That's beyond boisterous, seems to me. But, of course, he has had very excellent preps, as have many others. Lorraine has tested Storch's, Courtney's mine, Greg's and, yes, there is some variation--but all have been quite good. Greg's have been amongst the best, I might add. But let's not make this a debate of that kind. Anyway, spring is almost here. I'll be unearthing or making what I think will be the best preps (502, 503, 505, 504, 506, 507, horn clay, ) so far by far. And I'll be sending samples off to England for geomagnetic cards to be made. And I'd like to send samples off to Elaine for the most extensive lab tests she can do. We only have to pay the freight. Can we find out Elaine's economic requirements for testing and raise a fund for testing? I've got an idea we will find out a lot. Remember Dave Robison's post about what an analysis of the Valerian remedy and Horsetail decoction showed. Yes, the horsetail had some silica in it, but it was way up there in the phosphorus and sulfur. Maybe the silica didn't go into the decoction, but anyway the results of Dave's analysis were VERY interesting. We could do a lot, lot more in this direction. And, yeah! Dave. Good work. Time is flying. I'm building a shop to make chicken tractors. Have built a greenhouse and thinking of building another. The gravity water system worked great. Have to build a pole barn for round bales and also a walk-in refrigerator and well house. That should make this farm take off. Getting up to where you're on your power curve, like an engine between shifting gears, is great stuff. I'm busy, so please respect that. But let's raise funds if we need them and do the testing. Best, Hugh >The CSA season has started for me. Bonnie has volunteered to collect >funds and do the 'leg work' to get the JPI BC to the Ingham people. > >BD500 is sacramental to me, so I have no motivation for analyzing it. >Considering how effective BD501 is, I hardly have to think 'foodweb' >to have an explanation of how and why 500 works. > >Neither BC nor Pfeiffer Field Spray are true preps, I'm very happy to >take a look at them. > >For this reason, I'd vote for Pfeiffer Field Spray as item number two to test. > >-Allan > > >>My understanding is both Bonnie and Allan have volunteered to >>spearhead this. But who is? >> >>IMO the logical first candidate is Barrel Compound from JPI. This >>could be followed by BD 500 if the BC tests prove interesting. >> Don't think that most of other preps merit testing since they >>aren't organism rich. >>To save some money only tolal fungi and total bacteria could be >>measured. If enough funds then the active component could also be >>included. SFI offers a 5 & 10% discount for all and off the net per >>their recent flyer. >> >>Dan
