|
Hi! James,
Thank you for posting on the Lakhovsky
coils.
A couple of questions, that may expand
the concept a bit.
A). Do you see the Lakhovsky coil as
bringing Cosmic Energy down or Earth Energy up or both?
B). Do you build you coil as a left
hand or as a right hand coil?
C). Is the polarity you call the negative
end of the wire indicated by the pendulum swinging right had or left hand?
D). is it important to "point" the
coil in any particular direction?
Gil
James and Barbara Hedley wrote:
<?color><?param 0000,0000,8080>
Dear
Hugh and fellow list members,I agree wholeheartedly with your sentiments
that there must be something else than the csg strength of the soil.I dont
know what it is but there are some patches of our high gauss reading soils
that are the most incredibly difficult to grow crops on.I have put out
some Lakhovsky coils at strategic places around the blockand within a couple
of weeks all of a sudden there is new growth on everything,even in the
middle of a prolonged dry spell.A Lakhovsky coil is pretty much the same
as a Moody coil except that the coil is created in the shape of the old
Egyptian ankh. First you would dowse which end of the wirre is negative.
You then dowse the neutral point and the tear drop shape coil starts at
that point, with a 5mm gap where the wire returns. Dowse up for the length
above the coil, attach to a stake with about 6" above the top of the stake
as an aerial. It is put into the ground with the negative end of the wire
as the aerial.Frank Moody's coil is I believe a variation of this design.
Frank Moody once used his coils in a worn out potato patch of 100 acres
in Aberdeen [Scotland]. Within a couple of weeks there was a marked difference
and the crop turned out to be the best in living memory.Really quite amazing
considering that there were no reagents, just lengths of wire.I will keep
you informed as to the long term results. In the meantime I am desperately
trying to put some sort of handle as to why this works.Sincere greetings
to all from the land of the Wizards of Oz.James.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 4:13
PM
Subject: Re: Gauss readings of soil
Dear Jose,
What I'm having trouble with Dr. Callahan is my soil, according to his
meter, tests around 140 cgs. Yet it is so fertile it grows corn as a soil
improvement crop without fertilizer. So I think something else is going
on here besides paramagnetism and cgs readings. I respect AND like Phil
Callahan very much, but I do wish I could come to an understanding with
him on this. I feel sure all is not paramagnetism, though I also feel sure
he has tapped into some of the puzzle. 15 years ago he saw my slides of
applying granite quarry dust to my fields and commented "Good old paramagnetic
rock dust."
Well, according to his meter this rock dust only tested about 200+ cgs.
Yet it gave a great response on my soils. I wish I could get more of it,
though it took a few years to integrate itself into the land here. (The
local quarry doesn't sell it any more. I might add it had a 0.721 percent
phosphorus analysis and according to Reams theory that would be pretty
desirable) Surely it was very beneficial. But interestingly it was not
really a high cgs rock dust. You figure? I don't know and I question Phil's
idea that high cgs rock dusts are all that desirable. Maybe they are. But
I found low cgs rock dust was very desirable also. Huh? What's really going
on?
Best,
Hugh
Dear List members,
<?/color>
<?color><?param 0000,0000,8080>If any soil would have a Gauss
reading like the ones I have
seen posted lately ( like 2,000 ; 3,500, etc...) we could sell
those soils as magnets and probably make a fortune out of them.
Unfortunately that is not possible.
<?/color>
<?color><?param 0000,0000,8080>Soil Paramagnetism is measured
in micro CGS and not Gauss.
CGS stands for Centimeter, Gram and Second. In other words is
the amount of material in Grams, that will move a certain distance
in Centimeters over a period of time measured in Seconds when placed
near a say 2,000 Gauss magnet. That is indeed a very weak (subtle)
form of magnetism that cannot be permanently transmitted to the matter.
<?/color>
<?color><?param 0000,0000,8080>Magnetism is measured in Gauss.
<?/color>
<?color><?param 0000,0000,8080>Paramagnetism is measured in CGS.
Since Soil Paramagnetism is so
low we use micro CGS or CGS x 10(-6)<?/color> <?color><?param
0000,0000,8080>to express its paramagnetism.
According to Dr Callahan readings from 0 to 300 micro CGS would mean
a poor soil and soils with readings above say 1,200 uCGS would mean
fertile soils.
<?/color>
<?color><?param 0000,0000,8080>This whole story works perfectly
as long as your soil doesn´t have a fair
amount of Iron (Fe) . The theory holds true but Iron can mask the results
because then we would be measuring "Ferromagnetism" and not "Paramagnetism".
I have found that out when I purchased a PSCM Meter and started to
measure soils here
in Brazil like crazzy about two yeras ago..
I have asked Dr Callahan himself how to separate the Ferromagnetism
effect from
Paramagnetism and he was not able to give me a better idea than the
one I already had
which is to attract the iron particles with a strong magnet from a
distance that will be impossible
to be overcomed by the real Paramagnetic material and then re evaluate
the iron-free sample.
So, my advise would be : don´t take those numbers as a real measurement
of your
soil fertility because this isn´t necessarily true once you have
a fair amount of iron
( or any other ferromagnetic material ) in your soil.
<?/color>
<?color><?param 0000,0000,8080>Jose
<?/color>
<?paraindent><?param right,left>
-----
<?/paraindent><?paraindent><?param right,right,left,left>
Hi James and Barbara!
Thanks for all of your good work.....
For those of us still wishing to learn some of the technical lingo --
could you explain Gauss? Thanks!
Wayne
Hi Wayne
I will leave the technical explanation to James but in the meantime
if you want to do some testing yourself here's how
1. get a sample (or a couple of different ones) of paramagneteic rock
dust of known gauss and keep for reference, I keep mine in a normal paper
envelope.
2. now you need a small (1/2" diameter or smaller) but high quality
- strong - magnet - your ordinary fridge magnet type is not good enough
- and suspend the magnet on a piece of cotton about a foot or so long.
3. the magnet will stick to your envelope of paramagnetic material and
by moving the cotton away so that you have just enough tension on the cotton
to equal the weight of the magnet you find the magnet comes away from the
sample at a certain angle depending on the paramagnetic value or strength
of the material tested. The reverse of this of course is that a diamagnetic
material (lime for instance) should repel the magnet
Its a fun thing - but a good enough system to tell if a rock source
is worthy of serious testing - good enough that I was not all that surprised
by the reading we got on James's soil and a 1200 reading is regarded as
real good for soil DO NOT GET THIS LITTLE MAGNET ANYWHERE NEAR YOUR HOMEOPATHIC
REMEDIES OR YOU WILL NUKE THEM
Have fun
Lloyd Charles
<?/paraindent>
|
