|
Might I add my tuppence worth? Jane seems to
be the person most complained against but I, likle numerous previous posters,
have greatly appreciated her contributions. I was a minor offender in
posting some comments in favour of Palestinians rather than Israelis.
BDNow! comprises a group of liberal, like-minded and humane people whose advice
and opinions on practical spirituality, particularly as related to agriculture
and horticulture, is very valuable - but I also value your opinions on broader
matters, even when I totally disagree with them. The majority US
membership helps to counter both official sources of US news or opinion and
the far-right survivalist 'mountain men' who provide the only alternative
opinions given in our normal news media. I certainly have no group of
friends with whom this sort of discussion, face to face, could possibly compete,
and I know of no other comparable e-mail forum (can any of the critics suggest
one?).
After Stephen complained of the cost of receiving
political messages, whether or not he instantly deleted them, I made a few
sample timings and found that a BDNow message takes an average of just under one
second to arrive on my screen; I am connected by a normal UK telephone
line, not a specialist broadband one. This costs me peanuts - am I just
lucky in this?
I've marked this OFF, to suit anyone who is
filtering all but mainstream messages. Maybe we should at least take note
of Allan's occasional requests and use OFF wherever appropriate, also changing
the subject field as the nature of the thread changes?
Tony N-S.
|
- Re: OFF - Re: Political posts Anthony Nelson-Smith
- Re: OFF - Re: Political posts Hilary Wright
