Dear Gil, Nice to hear from you again. You ask about the likely effect of different potencies in agricultural applications. This subject has fascinated me for ages, unfortunately I have to report that I am really no closer to answering that question than when the quest started. Each time that that the answer seems to be in reach there seems to come along another explanation that might help illumine my path. It seems to be like Einstein's search for a unified field. If only I first knew all the physics of why homoeopathy works as it does it would be a good start. At present I am studying wave theory and frequency, as something that I read in one of Phillip Callahans books may help. He was talking about a spring tyne cultivator made in Australia that thad a reputation as being very good for weed control. Callahan tested it and found that it resonated at 700 hz, close enough to the frequency of Indigo [698 hz]. Further research into the effect of colour indicates that Indigo has the effect of sedation. Maybe there could be a use for colour therapy in soil amellioration. If there is a correlation between potentisation and frequency it should be possible to design experiments to test this theory. Does anyone have any ideas how this might be done or any ideas about the relationship of potentisation to frequency.
Yours sincerely James Hedley ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gil Robertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 11:42 AM Subject: Re: Viability of Homeopathic Potencies > Hi! James, > Would you like to post on your take on the likely effect of different potencies? > > About eight or ten years ago, I heard a talk by an agricultural homoeopath, who > stated some potencies sedated, while others stimulated, some are life > supporting and some are life suppressing. I can't find my notes at the moment > and I wondered if you had come across this or found it in the work you have > done. I am concerned that some of us armed with only part knowledge, may be > using potencies that have an effect other than the one we are aiming to have. > > Gil > > James Hedley wrote: > > > Dear Lloyd, Alan and everyone, > > Greetings from the Land of the Wizards of Oz. I have potencies in water that > > are up to 10 years old and they are still effective. > > Alcohol in the water is a good preserving medium. I use about 20%, but if > > the remedy is to be used immediately straight water will do. I use rainwater > > off the roof, however when the water supply runs low in the tank we pump > > spring water so there is always a plentiful supply of minerals in the water. > > When potentising large quantities of water into a spray tank for a boom > > spray etc a bit of molasses [around 2litres per 1000 litres is enough.] > > gives enough carbon to improve the potentisation. There is no scientific > > proof that this is more effective, but energetically it seems to take much > > less time than potentising into straight water.With a Rae 2 Pot potentiser I > > can potentise 5000 litres in around 30 minutes.- > > As for the use of D6 Equisetumthis is fine if you are hand dynamising it, > > with a two pot potentiser I would look at 60C as being more efective. The > > more dilute the substance the more efficaceous it becomes, particularly in > > soil amellioration work. > > Kind regards > > James---- Original Message ----- > > From: "Lloyd Charles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 8:06 AM > > Subject: Re: Viability of Homeopathic Potencies > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: Allan Balliett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 8:10 PM > > > Subject: Re: Viability of Homeopathic Potencies > > > > > > > > > > Dear Lloyd, et al, > > > > > > > > I was looking at the "Kolisko preferred receipe for 508" in Peter > > > > Proctor's book the other day. It's a D6 potentization of equesitum > > > > tea. Proctor asks for distilled water but I wouldn't think that that > > > > would be economically practical for us as the potentization was > > > > carried into gallons. Am I safe to assume that I can make a > > > > soon-to-be-used dilution with regular spring water? -allan > > > > > > > I can't see a problem - we use clean rainwater - if I lived in the hills > > and > > > had a nice clean potable spring I would use that > > > Instrument potentised or dilution and sucussion ? (just curious) > > > Cheers > > > Llolyd Charles > > > > > > > >
