Dear Markess, I had put your email away so that I had time to try and digest it and make sense of the data. I dont understand what you are trying to get at or how I could use it in the form that you have written it. For instance what do you mean by this set of potencies, Harmonics - potencies of 1M to 21M * > Amplitude - 6X & 7X > Velocity - 28X & 30X > Mode - 26X 29X 33X 47X 54X 69X 72X 79X > Number - 3X When I understand what you are trying to get at we could discuss the rest of the potencies that you suggest. Have a good day Janmes Hedley
----- Original Message ----- From: "Moen Creek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2002 1:52 AM Subject: Re: Kolisko's Work was Re: Viability of Homeopathic Potencies > Dear Listers, > inspired by > > James Hedley's wonderious post of > > Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 20:06:39 +1000 > > I looked to a basic level of remedies & potencies. > We're are not reductionest. Potencies are not doing the work but help > balance and organize energy field patterns. To get caught up in a > "misappropriation of cause" is the point of departure between the Vitalist > and the rock hard "scientist". > > When we add a potencized anything to an energy field there are effects & > affects on multiple areas/levels or maybe none at all. But it is an organism > and it's field that is doing the work. > > So what are the aspects these remedies action on fields. Hugh wrote a > Whitman'esk list at one time of field adjustments and variables. I have > followed some with the potencies I "see" as influencing this aspect. > > A field has, > > Hertz > Harmonics - potencies of 1M to 21M * > Amplitude - 6X & 7X > Velocity - 28X & 30X > Mode - 26X 29X 33X 47X 54X 69X 72X 79X > Number - 3X > Periodicity - 200C (rhythmical actions of plants including flowering & > fruiting) > Polarization - 1m - 21M * > Direction - Towards center is 200K - Towards the periphery 1K -100K > > *the differences here is in the handedness of the remedy > Harmonics are adjusted with Left handedness and polarization by Right > handedness > (your input is most welcome as whether this means type ie hamering, shaking > stiring to potencize or what. > For me it is a Radionic rate added to creating the potency > 32.25-51.25 sets it as Left handed > 51.25-32.25 set it as Right > > Fields also have > Flux > Defractions > Reflections > Interactions > Absorption > Synchronicity > Dimensions > can be Conditioned > Activated > and Templated > > What say's you? > > In Love & Light > Markess > ---------------- > > Dear list, > The problems with the work of Lili and Eugen Kolisko is that all the work > that I have seen never resolved an optimum potency which was common to all > plant or agricultural work. Potentisation rates of homoeopathic remedies is > not an exact science that says that if you use this potency you will get > this result. even amongst homoeopathic chat lists there is no common > acceptance that this , or that potency is better than another, it just that > this person used this remedy at this potency and achieved this result. As a > general rule the greater the similarity to the drug picture the higher > potency that you will use, the smaller the dose the more beneficial the > results. > The potencies for agricultural elimination use will be far different to > those potencies used for enhancing life force. Even potencies are only > really applicable for that particular time in that particular situation.. > The question is what potency will achieve the result that i am looking for > with the minimum amount of substance. > Peter Rheumkoff has removed white ants from a house by broadcasting a pepper > at LMM potency. > (snip) > When you are using spiritual forces to counteract something, the greatest > source of knowledge of the effects of your work will come from the spiritual > realms. Follow your guidance as to what the optimum potency would be. > I have tried at other times to get people on the list to discuss what they > are doing potency wise with their preps. I have used BD preps at potencies > of up to CM [a dilution of 1/1000 done 100 times] with great results. > There are three effective methods of checking potencies: > > 1.] The use of a radionic analysis instrument such as a Don Mattioda or > Malcolm Rae instrument, a Bio Photon instrument, a Bruce Copen or an SE-7 > will all give an automatic reading of potencies.Use of a radionic instrument > will give you an exact potency reading. They will give you a reading of > vitality which you can use to compare the effects of different potencies or > treatment options. > 2.] The use of a refractometer to test the effects of what you are doing. > This method is promoted by people such as Arden Andersen and Phillip Wheeler > 3.] The use of dowsing. As accurate as any radionic instrument.(snip) > > In many cases the correct rate, or alternatively potency rate could be the > subject of intellectual property which someone may not want to give out. > Just write to Glen and ask for how he makes his remedies. Even if he did > tell you everything that he has learnt from his experience you would still > not have that innate grasp of homoeopathy that comes from experience. > Potentisation can never be a cook book science. You will develop a feel for > the essence of what you are trying to do, the next thing is to experiment > in the same way as the Kolisko's did. There is never an easy way of gaining > knowledge. Second hand knowledge without a feel for the subject can lead > many a person into strife because the experimenter can affect the outcome of > the experiment. > I hope that this post will stimulate some discussion of methods and > techniques of agricultural radionics. > Sincere regards from the "Land of the Wizards of Oz" > James Hedley. > >
