In a message dated 9/26/02 5:35:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< As for your "unavoidable conflict" and "battle" between anthroposophy and the conventional approach to science, I must disagree. Perhaps this was the way of the past, it has no place today. In the present it is AVOIDABLE and battles NEED NOT OCCUR! Quit the contrary, we must silent the debate on who's right and who's wrong and work together in revealing the divine. >> Robin, as I have read your posts in the past I see that you have deep insight into what you say and present a well thought out discussion in a very rational realm. I have to say though that I do not see the bridge between Anthroposophical science an current science being bridged to easily in the neat future or without the latter hitting a solid brick wall. As an example for the simple work I do with biodynamics; last Winter I had some six scientists from Cornell to the farm to show them some of my methods. This farm has been in cultivation since 1640. We currently have 300-600 pounds of earthworms per acre on most of this land. This farm has gone through the war years using conventional chemicals up until the mid seventies when the conversion to organics and biodynamics began. These scientists came and went never to be heard from again. What to do about this, what do they think, does this occur everywhere??? I will try to keep your words in my head and heart and give all opportunities without casting doubt...sstorch
