Don In the early part of your article you mention 'a new and significant impulse to the spiritual life of mankind'
What do you belive this is? Your other points regarding the two streams of Anthroposophy not working together and the rejection and exclusivity you experience, as a long term member of that community, may well be linked together. It seems this chism in the physical body of anthroposphia extends into her spiritual bodies some way. I have often wondered about the immense resistance I have experienced to my own work, from Anthroposophists, and the fervour by which the sects seems to combat with another. In many ways this seems to be a general human tendancy, however for a 'spiritually' inclined group, the A team sure find the astrality a challenge. Good luck with your pursuits. Glen A Eve Cruse wrote: > > In the lecture series Karmic Relationships Vol. IV, Rudolf Steiner clearly > indicates that he expected the Platonic and Aristotelian streams to work > together at the end of the 20th century in order to bring a new and > significant impulse to the spiritual life of mankind. This expectation > prompts us to ask: what kind of impulse had he in mind? Certainly it would > need to be something in keeping with his own striving, but it would need > also to go beyond that which is explicit in his legacy, otherwise it could > not be considered a 'new' impulse. > Don Cruse -- Garuda Biodynamics - for BD Preps, Consultations, Books & Diagrams See our web site @ http://get.to/garuda
