----- Original Message -----
From: Hugh Lovel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Loss and Rebirth
Dear Hugh
Sadly for all of us I think your whole post is right on
the bulls eye! Why then is it so hard for people of influence to see this? I
know , money and power, but my god, how much money and power will it take to
satisfy these lunatics!! Its for sure the men who start this war will not be
in the frontline nor will any of their family. Our brown nosed little Aussie
"prime minister" is at least as dedicated to being a part of it as Bush and
Blair!
Anyway thanks for an excellent post, it might be a wake up call to someone!
Lloyd Charles
-just some snippetts to remind us again-
> and of course mostly it had to do with oil and
> money at the expense of such things as human rights, cultural improvement
> and democracy.
> Make no mistake. The US wanted him (Saddam) neither for his brains >nor
his beauty.
> The US wanted him for the same reasons the CIA and British Intelligence
put
> him in power originally--to divide and manipulate the region for the
> benefit of money and oil interests
> A dramatic attack by a foreign power on
> America and/or its citizens has long been the key ploy in getting
Americans
> to fight a war.
> I would guess the US WILL be in a war with Iraq, concievably by Christmas
> 2002. And if the US needs to go into Iran after occupying Iraq, it will do
> that too. >
> I would say the invasion of Iraq scenario became inevitable with the
> election of a president that raised $38 million the first month of his
> candidacy.
> No effort has been spared in making war with Iraq so far, and no
> effort will be spared after this November 5th's election.
> and this whole chain
> of events has far too much momentum to be halted.
>
> But no matter what, I think we will see a huge war and loss of
> life. It's too early to predict how huge.
> The big question in my mind is when will we reach a point where enough
> people have their eyes open that they no longer put up with being
> manipulated, their information watered down, their opinions distorted,
> their government policies bent to favor the biggest financial and
> industrial interests on earth?
>