----- Original Message ----- From: James Hedley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 10:36 PM Subject: Re: Perfect Orchard
> Dear Hugh, Lloyd, Gil, Per Garp and others, > Just to start the discussion rolling I agree that a field broadcaster is not > Radionics. It is just one of the many tools available to try to influence > subtle energy or force fields. OK guys - if its not radionics, what is it? We use radionically prepared homeopathic reagents in it, we can use it to do many of the same things that are done with a proper radionic instrument (broadcasting crows out of a paddock for example). I believe that the top well of a pipe could function as a radionic instrument does ie across time, space, unlimited distance. Do we need to agree on tight definitions here? Radionics to me is scanning analysis and treatment using variable rate instruments such as the Mattioda/ Rogers. There is much more of radiesthesia involved in the English system, but there is a huge area of overlap in all subtle energies from the ormus minerals through instruments of various types to classical biodynamic agriculture, all of these are treading the same patch of ground. Subtle energy is a step by step process for the newcomer. example- Its relatively easy to get across to an open minded person that we can take a polaroid photo of a field , animal, or whatever and capture the energy pattern on the metallic negative, then put that in the well of a radionic instrument and treat - the box has knobs and dials on , its ok for many people to go that far. Now tell that same person that we can use an old photo to treat a new problem and the eyes glaze a bit - we are into science fiction - time travel here to the newcomer. Another problem we have is where does our reality end (results) and our imagination start (what was going to happen anyway) I look forward to an interesting christmas break - this discussion could last into january easy Cheers Lloyd Charles
