> because I do not contribute in
> the same amount as say Steve Storch or Lloyd Charles or whoever makes me a
> lurker and not as worthwhile a contributor as someone else?. Is Hugh Lovel
> regared as a lurker because he conducts a watching brief on what is going
on
> through the list. Would you classify Greg Willis as a lurker?
Hey James - dont know what others think but for me postings from yourself ,
Hugh, Greg Willis, Glen Atkinson, are some of the cream we get on the list -
certainly dont think you guys are lurkers and I agree wholeheartedly eith
your next sentence
> To categorise a list member on the basis of how much they contribute and
> what they say demeans the value of any contribution to the list.
> It seems that Lloyd keeps on with the
> same message on his weed control methods without very much comment or
> discussion of the pro's and con's of his methods.
Do you mean here that I am on the wrong track with this or that it should be
drawing more discussion from the list?
Cheers
Lloyd Charles


Reply via email to