Allan, 
Why do you persist in your fear mongering with this thread? What makes you
think that your one experience of losing a job offering based upon one
experience of someone looking up your track record on the internet is a
common one to be experienced by folks contributing to this list?

How many people are really out there scanning these records for inflammatory
remarks made on a bd ag list? There is so much information overload, the
government can't even find real terrorists, let alone the threat of someone
putting some shit in a cow horn and spraying it homeopathically on a field
somewhere. Get real will you?

All your inuendo about me being out of touch with reality is really too
typical Allan. You are your own worst enemy, not the government or some
stupid bureaucrat denying you a job.

I have quit jobs before because of my so called ideals. Does this make me an
idealist? 

I think it is your attitude which probably is what loses jobs for you and
not some nonsense found in a search engine. Besides, as you yourself pointed
out, it doesn't matter what you really say online, someone can find you
"associated with views that are the opposite of what yours truly are."

So what is the point of password protected archives? I suspect that if you
were to put this whole group into a room together, the voices most often
'heard' on this list would be the same ones to speak most often in that room
in person. 

Jane

PS: Put your name into google, Allan, it's not very interesting. How far
down do you think they'll dig into the archives to 'get' something on you? I
think your attitude is far more dangerous than anything I've ever heard you
say or write.

> From: Allan Balliett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 19:05:21 -0500
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: LURKING was Re: Personal Security / Insecurity
> 
>> Whatever that means.
>> 
>>>  From: Allan Balliett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>  Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>  Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 14:45:42 -0500
>>>  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>  Subject: Re: LURKING was Re: Personal Security / Insecurity
>>> 
>>>  Me thinks, Jane, per chance you have no idea what the rest of us go
>>> through.
> 
> Excellent response!! -Allan
> 

Reply via email to