> # Glen - When you say potentised preps is that specifically potentised by > dilution and sucussion?
Yes prepared physically by hand. I can not really help you with radionically applied either by spray or device, and their effect, as I have not had alot of experience of them. The few tests I have done with my physically potentised preps and radionic versions - via square box- of the same, produced very different results in me when I have taken them. The radionic preps effect was minimal compared to the physical pot prep. I need to do more trials on this before I am convinced Radionic preps and potentised preps are the same thing. Can someone provide some picture evidence of the effect on plants re radionic preps verses control please, ala those on my website / Case Studies? cheers GA > # When I talk of radionically prepared preps I mean things that are > potentised by instrument but are then applied by spraying out onto a target > . I have assumed that both of the above stay where you put them and was > hoping that your work would support that assumption in both cases. (this has > important implications for how we use these) > #Application of either of the above by radionic broadcast of any type I > would expect to radiate out to boundaries and be difficult to keep from > effecting small areas (test plots) within the broader boundary. > > Does this make sense? does this agree with your experience or have I strayed > somewhere? You have been doing this a lot longer than me and I would > appreciate your guidance > Thanks > Lloyd Charles > >
